Failed Messiahs:
Madhusudan’s Prema Sai and Other Failed Messiahs
September 30, 2019
Madhusudan has made it clear that he intends to take a child and proclaim him as Prema Sai. What he hasn’t announced is that this child will be chosen by them from among the children attending their Mandya school campus. Why will the child come from the Mandya campus? Because Swami said that Prema Sai would be from the Mandya district. Since Swami said this, obtaining a campus in the Mandya district was Narasimhamurthy's top priority after he announced the subtle body fallacy in 2011. Consequently, it was the first campus the Muddenahalli group bought and began work on.
They will take a child from the Mandya campus, tell that child that he is Prema Sai and then attempt to twist the child over a period of years to be their next cash cow. This is similar to what the Theosophists tried to do 100 years ago with J Krishnamurti. In fact, there are many parallels between J Krishnamurti's case and that of Madhusudan and his artificially manufactured Prema Sai.
Theosophical leader Annie Besant promoted the idea of Theosophy's founder, Helena Blavatsky, that the next 'world teacher' would soon arrive. This world teacher would be a spirit who would possess a suitable person and use them as a vehicle. That person would then become the next world teacher. Sound familiar? Besant and other Theosophical leaders therefore founded a group called The Order of the Star in the East and initiated a project to find the 'vehicle.' This was called the 'World Teacher Project.' The members of this project then began looking for this 'suitable vehicle' and found it in the boy Jiddu Krishnamurti, a child from Chennai.
Krishnamurti was taken away from his family as a 10-year-old and told that he would be the vehicle and communicator for a spirit called 'Lord Maitreya.' Maitreya is the name of the next Buddha, however Theosophy claims that Maitreya was the spirit which possessed both Krishna and Christ, enabling them to become world teachers.
Krishnamurti was taken away from his parents, who later tried unsuccessfully to get him back from the Theosophists. Krishnamurti was then progressively indoctrinated into believing that he was to be the vehicle for this 'Maitreya.' He was mentored and trained by the leaders of the Theosophical Society to become their 'world teacher.' He was taken around the world by the leaders of the Theosophical Society, to give speeches in their centres. He also wrote books which claimed to be communications from this spirit. Miracles were also attributed to their 'Maitreya' spirit whom they claimed was working through Krishnamurti. Those who came to him said, just as those visiting Madhusudan say, that they felt a tremendous power around him. Theosophical leader Charles Leadbeater gave an eyewitness account of one of these occasions:
A tremendous power, which was so evidently flowing through Alcyone [K.] that the next member [in line] fell at his feet, overwhelmed by this marvellous rush of force. I have never seen or felt anything in the least like it; it reminded one irresistibly of the rushing, mighty wind, and the outpouring of the Holy Ghost at Pentecost.
http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/thopv/KWTP-SantucciInytro.pdf
Just as some of Madhusudan’s more high-profile followers have claimed that they see Madhusudan change into Swami, people claimed to see Krishnamurti change into the form of 'Maitreya.' Krishnamurti's own brother Nitya describes one such incident:
The place seemed to be filled with a Great Presence and a great longing came upon me to go on my knees and adore, for I knew that the Great Lord of all our hearts had come Himself; and though we saw Him not, yet all felt the splendour of His presence. Then the eyes of Rosalind were opened and she saw. Her face changed as I have seen no face change, for she was blessed enough to see with physical eyes the glories of that night. Her face was transfigured, as she said to us, 'Do you see Him, do you see Him?' for she saw the divine Bodhisattva [the Lord Maitreya], and millions wait for incarnations to catch such a glimpse of our Lord, but she had eyes of innocence and had served our Lord faithfully.
http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/thopv/KWTP-SantucciInytro.pdf
Note that the witness talks about the fact that they could sense the presence of this spirit but could not see him? Just like Muddenahalli followers claim that they can feel Swami's presence but can't see him. Sounds a little familiar doesn't it?
And just like Madhusudan, over time, Krishnamurti went from talking about Maitreya as a separate person, to speaking as if he was Maitreya:
The second incident, which might be interpreted as evolving from the "process," took place on the 28th of December 1925. At the Congress of the Order of the Star in the East in Adyar, an extraordinary event occurred. As K. was speaking, he abruptly changed personal pronouns from "he" to "I" in reference to the World Teacher:
"He comes only to those who want, who desire, who long--" and then suddenly, "I come for those who want sympathy, who want happiness, who are longing to find happiness in all things. I come to reform and not to tear down, I come not to destroy, but to build."
http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/thopv/KWTP-SantucciInytro.pdf
So, what Theosophy tried to do with Krishnamurti is exactly what Madhusudan is planning to do with his manufactured Prema Sai. He claims that Prema Sai is currently just a normal boy who doesn't know who he is and that at some point after he comes to Muddenahalli, he will be possessed by the ghost of Sathya Sai Baba, thus becoming Prema Sai. Madhusudan also claims that it will be his role to 'teach and train and mentor' this Prema Sai, so that he knows how to be an Avatar. What nonsense! An Avatar is born omniscient and aware of who he is, according to Baba. He therefore needs no training! Only the utterly desperate would believe this claim!
But what was the result of Theosophy's attempt to invent a world teacher? Was there any truth to their claims that Krishnamurti was being possessed by Maitreya? No. It appears from Krishnamurti’s own reaction that there was no more truth than there is in Madhusudan’s claim to be possessed by Sathya Sai Baba. Krishnamurti himself became disenchanted by the attempt by the leaders of the 'World Teacher Project' to force him to become a world teacher. He ended their 'World Teacher Project,' by publicly disbanding the Order of the Star in the East and renouncing Theosophy, along with Maitreya and their world teacher theories altogether. On this occasion, August 3rd 1929, Krishnamurti also said:
For eighteen years you have been preparing for this event, for the Coming of the World-Teacher....I do not care if you believe that I am the World-Teacher or not. That is of very little importance....Your prejudices, your fears, your authorities, your churches new and old--all these, I maintain, are a barrier to understanding....So you will see how absurd is the whole structure that you have built, looking for external help, depending on others for your comfort, for your happiness, for your strength. These can only be found within yourselves....You can form other organizations and expect someone else. With that I am not concerned, nor with creating new cages new decorations for those cages. My only concern is to set men absolutely, unconditionally free.
http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/thopv/KWTP-SantucciInytro.pdf
There are parallels between the World Teacher Project and the project Narasimhamurthy has undertaken to convince people that Madhusudan Naidu is Sathya Sai Baba, ludicrous as that concept is. It almost looks like Theosophy's process of turning J Krishnamurti into a supposed world teacher is the template Narasimhamurthy used for Madhusudan's gradual self-promotion from 'communicator,' to 'vehicle' to 'Sri Madhusudan Sai.'
What Theosophy tried to do with Krishnamurti is also exactly what Madhusudan is planning to do with his manufactured Prema Sai. Just as Theosophy claimed that a normal boy, Krishnamurti, would be possessed by Maitreya, Madhusudan claims that Prema Sai is currently just a normal boy who doesn't know who he is and that at some point after he comes to Muddenahalli, he will be possessed by the ghost of Sathya Sai Baba, thus becoming Prema Sai. Just as Leadbeater and the other Theosophical leaders took it upon themselves to mentor and train Krishnamurti to become their prophesied world teacher, Madhusudan also claims that it will be his role to 'teach and train and mentor' this Prema Sai, so that he knows how to be an Avatar.
The idea that Madhusudan could train someone to become an Avatar is his own delusion. Madhusudan claims to be Self-Realised and therefore free of delusion, yet at the same time claims he will train Prema Sai on how to be an Avatar! What utter nonsense! An Avatar is born omniscient and fully aware of whom they are according to Baba. The real Prema Sai will need no training! When it comes to the idea of Madhusudan teaching an omniscient Avatar how to be an Avatar, only the utterly desperate or the deeply deluded would fall for this obvious lie!
Krishnamurti himself became disenchanted by their attempt to force him to become a world teacher. He ended their 'World Teacher Project' by disbanding the Order of the Star in the East and publicly renouncing Theosophy altogether. He then left Theosophy completely and became a teacher in his own right. It is therefore entirely possible that the same thing will happen with Madhusudan's artificially created Prema Sai. No doubt, this is Madhusudan's fear. Because whether he believes it or not, what Swami said is inevitable - Truth Triumphs, falsehood fails.
Madhusudan claims that their Prema Sai will be entirely silent. How utterly convenient for him, as he won't have to teach the boy public speaking and won't have to worry about his Prema Sai getting the bad publicity he's had to endure every time he contradicts the genuine teachings of Sathya Sai Baba. He just tells people that they must be special in order to understand his Prema Sai's silence. And, their egos wanting desperately to be considered as special, his followers will claim to have unmatched spiritual experiences and insights.
And let's not forget that Madhusudan claims that his Prema Sai will only live for 54 years, even though Swami said in Sri Sathya Sai Anandadayi that Prema Sai would live for 75 years:
The present Avatar will last for ninety six years, and, after a gap of one year, Prema Sai Avatar will assume human body and last for seventy five years.
Sri Sathya Sai Anandadayi, Journey with Sai, p.64
What will happen when Madhusudan's manufactured Avatar reaches 54 years old? Will he be euthanised in order to fulfil Madhusudan's prophecy? We can only hope not. However, if they even get that far (which I sincerely doubt very much, because the real Prema Sai will have announced Himself by then) I expect that their Prema Sai will announce (through sign language? Gestures? Interpretative dance maybe? He is supposed to be entirely silent after all) that he has decided to extend his life indefinitely. Again, how utterly convenient.
Whatever happens, the fact remains that what Madhusudan is intending to perpetrate is child abuse. Separating a child from their family, indoctrinating the child to impersonate a spiritual leader, to act as if they are a person they know they are not. Effectively trapping the child in a life not of their choosing, by setting them up as a cult leader and manipulating them for the rest of their life - this is a clearly articulated admission that he intends to commit child abuse. Those who choose to support this course of action will be complicit to that abuse.
They will take a child from the Mandya campus, tell that child that he is Prema Sai and then attempt to twist the child over a period of years to be their next cash cow. This is similar to what the Theosophists tried to do 100 years ago with J Krishnamurti. In fact, there are many parallels between J Krishnamurti's case and that of Madhusudan and his artificially manufactured Prema Sai.
Theosophical leader Annie Besant promoted the idea of Theosophy's founder, Helena Blavatsky, that the next 'world teacher' would soon arrive. This world teacher would be a spirit who would possess a suitable person and use them as a vehicle. That person would then become the next world teacher. Sound familiar? Besant and other Theosophical leaders therefore founded a group called The Order of the Star in the East and initiated a project to find the 'vehicle.' This was called the 'World Teacher Project.' The members of this project then began looking for this 'suitable vehicle' and found it in the boy Jiddu Krishnamurti, a child from Chennai.
Krishnamurti was taken away from his family as a 10-year-old and told that he would be the vehicle and communicator for a spirit called 'Lord Maitreya.' Maitreya is the name of the next Buddha, however Theosophy claims that Maitreya was the spirit which possessed both Krishna and Christ, enabling them to become world teachers.
Krishnamurti was taken away from his parents, who later tried unsuccessfully to get him back from the Theosophists. Krishnamurti was then progressively indoctrinated into believing that he was to be the vehicle for this 'Maitreya.' He was mentored and trained by the leaders of the Theosophical Society to become their 'world teacher.' He was taken around the world by the leaders of the Theosophical Society, to give speeches in their centres. He also wrote books which claimed to be communications from this spirit. Miracles were also attributed to their 'Maitreya' spirit whom they claimed was working through Krishnamurti. Those who came to him said, just as those visiting Madhusudan say, that they felt a tremendous power around him. Theosophical leader Charles Leadbeater gave an eyewitness account of one of these occasions:
A tremendous power, which was so evidently flowing through Alcyone [K.] that the next member [in line] fell at his feet, overwhelmed by this marvellous rush of force. I have never seen or felt anything in the least like it; it reminded one irresistibly of the rushing, mighty wind, and the outpouring of the Holy Ghost at Pentecost.
http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/thopv/KWTP-SantucciInytro.pdf
Just as some of Madhusudan’s more high-profile followers have claimed that they see Madhusudan change into Swami, people claimed to see Krishnamurti change into the form of 'Maitreya.' Krishnamurti's own brother Nitya describes one such incident:
The place seemed to be filled with a Great Presence and a great longing came upon me to go on my knees and adore, for I knew that the Great Lord of all our hearts had come Himself; and though we saw Him not, yet all felt the splendour of His presence. Then the eyes of Rosalind were opened and she saw. Her face changed as I have seen no face change, for she was blessed enough to see with physical eyes the glories of that night. Her face was transfigured, as she said to us, 'Do you see Him, do you see Him?' for she saw the divine Bodhisattva [the Lord Maitreya], and millions wait for incarnations to catch such a glimpse of our Lord, but she had eyes of innocence and had served our Lord faithfully.
http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/thopv/KWTP-SantucciInytro.pdf
Note that the witness talks about the fact that they could sense the presence of this spirit but could not see him? Just like Muddenahalli followers claim that they can feel Swami's presence but can't see him. Sounds a little familiar doesn't it?
And just like Madhusudan, over time, Krishnamurti went from talking about Maitreya as a separate person, to speaking as if he was Maitreya:
The second incident, which might be interpreted as evolving from the "process," took place on the 28th of December 1925. At the Congress of the Order of the Star in the East in Adyar, an extraordinary event occurred. As K. was speaking, he abruptly changed personal pronouns from "he" to "I" in reference to the World Teacher:
"He comes only to those who want, who desire, who long--" and then suddenly, "I come for those who want sympathy, who want happiness, who are longing to find happiness in all things. I come to reform and not to tear down, I come not to destroy, but to build."
http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/thopv/KWTP-SantucciInytro.pdf
So, what Theosophy tried to do with Krishnamurti is exactly what Madhusudan is planning to do with his manufactured Prema Sai. He claims that Prema Sai is currently just a normal boy who doesn't know who he is and that at some point after he comes to Muddenahalli, he will be possessed by the ghost of Sathya Sai Baba, thus becoming Prema Sai. Madhusudan also claims that it will be his role to 'teach and train and mentor' this Prema Sai, so that he knows how to be an Avatar. What nonsense! An Avatar is born omniscient and aware of who he is, according to Baba. He therefore needs no training! Only the utterly desperate would believe this claim!
But what was the result of Theosophy's attempt to invent a world teacher? Was there any truth to their claims that Krishnamurti was being possessed by Maitreya? No. It appears from Krishnamurti’s own reaction that there was no more truth than there is in Madhusudan’s claim to be possessed by Sathya Sai Baba. Krishnamurti himself became disenchanted by the attempt by the leaders of the 'World Teacher Project' to force him to become a world teacher. He ended their 'World Teacher Project,' by publicly disbanding the Order of the Star in the East and renouncing Theosophy, along with Maitreya and their world teacher theories altogether. On this occasion, August 3rd 1929, Krishnamurti also said:
For eighteen years you have been preparing for this event, for the Coming of the World-Teacher....I do not care if you believe that I am the World-Teacher or not. That is of very little importance....Your prejudices, your fears, your authorities, your churches new and old--all these, I maintain, are a barrier to understanding....So you will see how absurd is the whole structure that you have built, looking for external help, depending on others for your comfort, for your happiness, for your strength. These can only be found within yourselves....You can form other organizations and expect someone else. With that I am not concerned, nor with creating new cages new decorations for those cages. My only concern is to set men absolutely, unconditionally free.
http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/thopv/KWTP-SantucciInytro.pdf
There are parallels between the World Teacher Project and the project Narasimhamurthy has undertaken to convince people that Madhusudan Naidu is Sathya Sai Baba, ludicrous as that concept is. It almost looks like Theosophy's process of turning J Krishnamurti into a supposed world teacher is the template Narasimhamurthy used for Madhusudan's gradual self-promotion from 'communicator,' to 'vehicle' to 'Sri Madhusudan Sai.'
What Theosophy tried to do with Krishnamurti is also exactly what Madhusudan is planning to do with his manufactured Prema Sai. Just as Theosophy claimed that a normal boy, Krishnamurti, would be possessed by Maitreya, Madhusudan claims that Prema Sai is currently just a normal boy who doesn't know who he is and that at some point after he comes to Muddenahalli, he will be possessed by the ghost of Sathya Sai Baba, thus becoming Prema Sai. Just as Leadbeater and the other Theosophical leaders took it upon themselves to mentor and train Krishnamurti to become their prophesied world teacher, Madhusudan also claims that it will be his role to 'teach and train and mentor' this Prema Sai, so that he knows how to be an Avatar.
The idea that Madhusudan could train someone to become an Avatar is his own delusion. Madhusudan claims to be Self-Realised and therefore free of delusion, yet at the same time claims he will train Prema Sai on how to be an Avatar! What utter nonsense! An Avatar is born omniscient and fully aware of whom they are according to Baba. The real Prema Sai will need no training! When it comes to the idea of Madhusudan teaching an omniscient Avatar how to be an Avatar, only the utterly desperate or the deeply deluded would fall for this obvious lie!
Krishnamurti himself became disenchanted by their attempt to force him to become a world teacher. He ended their 'World Teacher Project' by disbanding the Order of the Star in the East and publicly renouncing Theosophy altogether. He then left Theosophy completely and became a teacher in his own right. It is therefore entirely possible that the same thing will happen with Madhusudan's artificially created Prema Sai. No doubt, this is Madhusudan's fear. Because whether he believes it or not, what Swami said is inevitable - Truth Triumphs, falsehood fails.
Madhusudan claims that their Prema Sai will be entirely silent. How utterly convenient for him, as he won't have to teach the boy public speaking and won't have to worry about his Prema Sai getting the bad publicity he's had to endure every time he contradicts the genuine teachings of Sathya Sai Baba. He just tells people that they must be special in order to understand his Prema Sai's silence. And, their egos wanting desperately to be considered as special, his followers will claim to have unmatched spiritual experiences and insights.
And let's not forget that Madhusudan claims that his Prema Sai will only live for 54 years, even though Swami said in Sri Sathya Sai Anandadayi that Prema Sai would live for 75 years:
The present Avatar will last for ninety six years, and, after a gap of one year, Prema Sai Avatar will assume human body and last for seventy five years.
Sri Sathya Sai Anandadayi, Journey with Sai, p.64
What will happen when Madhusudan's manufactured Avatar reaches 54 years old? Will he be euthanised in order to fulfil Madhusudan's prophecy? We can only hope not. However, if they even get that far (which I sincerely doubt very much, because the real Prema Sai will have announced Himself by then) I expect that their Prema Sai will announce (through sign language? Gestures? Interpretative dance maybe? He is supposed to be entirely silent after all) that he has decided to extend his life indefinitely. Again, how utterly convenient.
Whatever happens, the fact remains that what Madhusudan is intending to perpetrate is child abuse. Separating a child from their family, indoctrinating the child to impersonate a spiritual leader, to act as if they are a person they know they are not. Effectively trapping the child in a life not of their choosing, by setting them up as a cult leader and manipulating them for the rest of their life - this is a clearly articulated admission that he intends to commit child abuse. Those who choose to support this course of action will be complicit to that abuse.
www.theTrueSai.weebly.com © 2020
All rights reserved.
All rights reserved.